Click Here for your Assignment.
Strong support for the hypothesis that acculturation explains a significant portion of health behavior among Hispanics is generally lacking. In most studies, acculturation is strongly associated with socioeconomic variables, such as education and income. When adjustments are made for socioeconomic status, the relationship between dimensions of acculturation and health status or health behavior weakens or disappears altogether. For example, in an analysis of the use of preventive services (physical, den tal, eye examinations, Pap smear and breast exam) in the Hispanic HANES survey, Solis et al. (AJPH, 1990) found that utilization was predicted more strongly by access to care than by acculturation, after controlling for age education, and income. Althoug h language preference predicted utilization, the authors concluded that the language barrier should be viewed as another access variable, and not as a cultural factor.
Compare the items in the acculturation measure of Hazuda and the HHANES measure. What dimensions of acculturation do they have in common? What dimensions are missing from the HHANES measure? Do you believe the HHANES acculturation measur e is adequate for large-scale health surveys in Hispanic subpopulations? Why or why not? Is Hazuda's measure a good substitute? Why or why not?
Hazuda HP, Haffner SM, Stern MP, Eifler, CW: Effects of acculturation and socioeconomic status on obesity and diabetes in Mexican Americans. Amer J Epidemiology 1988;128:1289-1301.
Suarez L: Pap smear and mammogram screening in Mexican-American women: The effects of acculturation. Amer J Public Health 1994;84:742-746.
Marks G, Solis J, Richardson JL et al.: Health behavior of elderly Hispanic women: Does cultural assimilation make a difference? Amer J Public Health 1987;77:1315-1391.