by Christof Spieler
THOMAS BEEBY GOT THE DETAILS RIGHT.
No recent Rice
building has been as interesting close up as the new Baker Institute. From
afar, it looks static. From close range, though, it is animated and finely
detailed. It gets even better inside: The interior is simple and elegant, grand
but understated.
Rice's early buildings (Lovett Hall, Physics Laboratories and the old
Mechanical Engineering Building are prime examples) have an amazing level of
detail: detailed window frames, carved balconies and sculptural column
capitals. That sort of architecture went out of style with the beginning of
modern architecture in the 1930s. When its general approach was revived in the
1980s, the details were greatly simplified (Mudd Lab and Alice Pratt Brown
Hall, for example, may resemble old buildings from far away but are
considerably cruder up close). Part of this has to do with the cost of labor,
but at least in some part architects have forgotten how to do such details in
this age of computerized drafting.
In that context the Baker Institute is a surprise. Using "cast stone" (a sort
of high-class concrete), Beeby has added finely detailed window frames, columns
and doorways. The detailing is crisp and well-proportioned. The front entrance
in particular is a showpiece. Many of these details are patterned on older Rice
buildings, and that effort has paid off.
The interior, by contrast, is unlike any we have seen at Rice. The building's
central space is a four-story-tall atrium, surrounded by three levels of
arcades and topped with a light blue coffered ceiling. The plane of the walls
is broken by simple and well-proportioned pilasters. Light streams in from
overhead skylights. The effect brings to mind a church.
Even away from the central space, in hallways and offices, the space has been
well-considered. The ceilings are high, giving everything from hallways to
offices a sense of spaciousness.
The entire interior, from the arcades in the center to the tall hallways, is
well-proportioned. The overall effect is that of the early Renaissance:
classical forms applied with a sense of proportion and simplicity.
The box all this comes in, though, is still just that, a box. The building
relates little to its surroundings; it is as though a spaceship has landed on
the powderpuff field and parked in alignment with the street corner. The doors
face only parking lots and tennis courts, and the major path which goes up to
the building from Rayzor Hall meets only a blank wall. Good buildings animate
the space around them; this one just sits there.
The impression the building gives, with its small windows and closed shape, is
that of a fortress, an unfortunate appearance for the home of an institute that
was created in part to bring people and disciplines together. I only wish Beeby
had managed to communicate to the outside world what a wonderful place he has
created within.
This item appeared in the Features section of the February 28, 1997 issue.
|