Serving as editors of the `Thresher' is a tough, but rewarding, challenge.
When we decided in February 1996 to run for
Thresher
editors in chief, we had two goals in mind: to make the
Thresher
the
best it can be and to give every Rice student a reason to pick up the paper. We
realized, of course, that it is impossible to satisfy everyone's newspaper
needs 100 percent of the time -- but we refused to allow that to keep us from
trying.
Rice has grown in the past 12 months. The
Thresher
in this period
covered the opening of the Computational Engineering Building and the opening
of the Baker Institute building, with more growth coming as the nanotechnology
building approaches its completion. This year saw the 40th anniversary of the
college system and Beer-Bike. We have had the opportunity to cover
international leaders and Nobel laureates alike.
We have strived over the past year to foster open debate on a variety of
topics. Some of the issues tackled in the
Thresher
's pages during our
administration include the history of women at Rice, student-administrator
relations, KTRU and the possibility of its oversight, needed improvements to
facilities and grounds, the effects of
Hopwood vs. State of Texas
on
minority enrollment at Rice, assaults and campus safety.
Of course, for every story we did cover, there are a dozen others we did not,
due to a lack of resources. Many students do not realize how time-intensive
putting out the
Thresher
is. Each person in the staff box -- on average
-- spends about 20 hours a week in the
Thresher
office (some, in fact,
spend twice that amount); if you don't believe us, just ask a roommate of any
of our Editorial Board members. We would need to spend even more time to put
out the type of paper we would like to. Time and advertising revenue govern how
big we can be.
If you want to see more from the
Thresher
, get involved. You can talk to
staff members, you can write letters to the editor -- but the best way to enact
positive change is simply to get involved. If you don't have time to be on the
Editorial Board, there are always other, smaller commitments: writing stories,
taking photos, selling ads. Like bit players in a full-scale drama, it can
safely be said that there are no small roles, just small actors.
Overall, it has been an educational year for us, to say the least. The Backpage
once again became a hotly-debated issue. Dealing with the criticism of the
infamous "Rice Women Are Like ..." Backpage taught us the importance of good
public relations. We freely admit that we could have dealt with the controversy
better, and probably should have taken the time to explain to the entire
student body our reasons for having a Backpage. But we felt at the time the
best way to handle the situation was by being receptive to students who cared
enough to bring their opinions directly to the staff.
The Backpage has, in the past few years, been a part of the
Thresher
that editors have regularly re-evaluated. The Backpage is simultaneously the
most hated and the most loved part of the paper. Some question whether it
belongs in its current form in a student newspaper, or in
any
newspaper.
Most of the
Thresher
staff supports the existence of the Backpage
because it attracts readership, and past surveys of undergraduates have
revealed that more students want to keep it than eliminate or drastically
change it. The reaction of readers to the Backpage this past year suggests that
student opinion may be changing, and our successors will be dealing with this
issue by conducting another survey.
The main lesson we have learned as editors in chief is this: You can't make all
of the people happy all of the time, but you can damn sure try. We've learned
that we should have worked more on public relations and that we should never
assume that others understand our reasons for our decisions.
With this being our final issue as editors in chief, we would like to thank the
students, faculty and staff who have been supportive of our efforts to produce
a quality student newspaper. Without the audience, especially the students,
there would be no reason for the
Thresher
to exist. But most of all we
want to thank our hard-working staff. Without the section editors, assistant
section editors, writers, proofers, photographers and other staff members,
there would be no
Thresher
.
-- Marty Beard and Vivek Rao
1996-97 Editors in Chief
This item appeared in the Opinion section of the March 21, 1997 issue.
|