by Peter Debruge
When you think of a "typical family film," I bet the
first thing that pops into your head is a lighthearted Disney comedy that
incorporates a cute kid, some type of animal (killer whale, chimpanzee,
wildebeest, whatever) and a couple of bumbling bad guys. Now what do you call a
movie
about
families -- the ways they work and the ways they do not?
The Daytrippers
adds an extra twist to the definition of "family film,"
departing from children's entertainment for a blend of comedy and drama aimed
at adult audiences.
"I remember hearing some expert claim that 97 percent of all families are
`dysfunctional,'"
Daytrippers
writer/director Greg Mottola said. "It
made me [wonder] ... who are the
freaks
that make up that 3 percent of
`functional' families?"
With the possible exception of the Brady Bunch, media families are rarely a
clan of comfortably smiling ninnies with nothing more to worry about than
planning vacations. It is safe to assume that most of us come from families
that do not work exactly as they should, so it should be easy for us to relate
to other dysfunctional families. This idea, combined with that of a road trip
that forces an average American family to spend some quality time together,
inspired Mottola to write
Daytrippers
.
With his award-winning debut, Mottola achieves everything Kevin Smith didn't in
Clerks.
Both films introduced promising young writer/directors who made
their movies without the backing of a major studio. With
Clerks
, Smith
practices his primary talent: reflecting what "real" Generation Xers talk and
think about (i.e., sex and
Star Wars
).
Mottola opts against Smith's brand of character: shallow with moments of deep
enlightenment. Instead, he introduces characters who are just as ordinary, yet
much more familiar -- people just like your parents and friends. Mottola's
script gives us plenty of opportunities to laugh at the personalities that tend
to get on our nerves.
For the first part of
Daytrippers
, the plot sweeps the movie along on an
undercurrent of suspense while providing an excuse for us to eavesdrop on a
"typical" family. At the end, an unexpected twist breaks through, unveiling the
movie's dramatic side and making us ask ourselves about the meaning of love.
While cleaning up her husband Louis' (Stanley Tucci of
Big Night
)
things, happily married Eliza D'Amico (Hope Davis) discovers what appears to be
a love note addressed to her husband from an admirer named Sandy. Afraid of
what the note could mean for what seems to be a stable relationship, Eliza goes
to her parents' house to ask their opinions. No one knows quite what to make of
the situation -- though her sister Jo (Parker Posey) gives a hilarious
20th-century interpretation of the Andrew Marvell poem quoted in the note. The
whole family decides to drive to New York so Eliza can confront Louis
face-to-face about the letter at his workplace.
As the family travels to New York, we fall in love with all of them, despite
their annoying characteristics. While Eliza nervously considers the possible
explanations for the note, the rest of her family rambles. Between the babbling
of Eliza's overprotective mother Rita (Anne Meara), the grunts of her
Neanderthal father Jim (Pat McNamara) and the complaints of her rebellious
sister (Posey), who brings along her fiance Carl (Liev Schrieber), the
conversation never stops long enough for our attention to dwindle.
Jo never agrees with anything her mother says, and, to her growing dismay, Carl
and her mother are crazy about each other. Everyone knows someone like Carl, an
intellectual collegian who is a little too impressed with his own wit. Carl is
the kind of guy you might find yourself discussing politics with at 3 a.m.:
"The working class has God. What does the middle class have, infomercials?"
Yawn. We understand how Jo could tire of him.
While trying to pass the time in the car, Carl proudly explains the novel he
has just finished writing. His novel doubles as a social commentary and centers
around the life of a man who is "normal in every way except for, you know, the
dog's head."
Mottola has an amazing sense of humor that casually pokes fun at every
character without badgering any of them. He depicts awkward situations and
seems to enjoy characters and events with a sense of mystery -- qualities that
make the movie all the more entertaining. For example, Mottola triggers our
suspicions when the family gets to Louis's workplace, and Eliza discovers that
he has taken the day off. In the meantime, a suave writer hits on the
vulnerable Eliza while her mother tries to find out if Louis' secretary
Cassandra ever goes by the nickname "Sandy."
Stuck in New York for the day, the family does its best to find Louis, a task
that leads to several unusual encounters. Whether looking at the family lives
of the main characters or those of the people they meet, Mottola makes some
interesting observations. Along the way, the family meets both a young man who
hides his criminal father in his apartment and two greedy old sisters who argue
over how to divide an inheritance: "Then
I
get the Tylenol with
codeine!" For a movie that appears to be about nothing more than family
relationships,
Daytrippers
hits on so much more.
Many films alienate the audience with bizarre plots or unbelievable roles, but
the familiarity of the characters in
Daytrippers
draws us right into the
story. However, the show is not for everyone; it is most likely to hit home
with college students and people who are just entering the "real world."
"I wanted a lot of the humor in the film to disarm the audience, to make [it]
less prepared for the end," Mottola said. "I was really trying to create a
whiplash effect, to recreate how it feels when you suddenly realize something
you believed your whole life is not what you think it is."
If Mottola wanted whiplash to be the audience's reaction, his movie is a
carefully crafted success. After sending us on a comfortable drive, he hits us
with several surprising twists. Despite subtle hints to the contrary, the
family in
Daytrippers
seems too nice to be jostled around. Nevertheless,
their lives transform completely by the end, which comes too soon for a movie
that attaches us so closely to its characters.

This item appeared in the Arts & Entertainment section of the April 11, 1997 issue.
|