by Jeff Zinsmeister
I LIKE
East Coast urbanism. Not for the weather,
really -- I like the hot, sultry Houston summers more than most -- but for the
feel of the cities there.
I like the noise, the bustle, the clamor, the bright lights, the honking horns,
the smell of the subway and the sound of car alarms. I like the humanity that
oozes from the dirty concrete pores. It permeates everything: Fifth Avenue,
Hyde Park, Dupont Circle, South Station, even Central Park. Humanity is hard to
avoid on the East Coast.
What I enjoy most is the feeling of community one feels within the urban
jungle. Certainly not the same community that small-town America offers, and
not nearly as friendly, but there is a sense of being part of something larger.
It is a feeling found while walking around Chicago's State and Wabash the day
after Christmas, strolling through Piedmont Park in Atlanta when the
rollerbladers are out in force, and the soccer fanatics hit the field, or
sweating it out on Metro during rush hour. It's sometimes grimy, sometimes
hectic, but you never feel alone.
I miss that feeling here in Houston. Even my native Atlanta, another product of
the Sunbelt boom, has some semblance of that lovely urban atmosphere. It is a
place where you can talk about the Braves game with the man next to you on the
train coming home from the stadium or smile and nod when the drunk college
student who has accosted you in Buckhead rambles incessantly.
Houston, however, is devoid of this mercurial, seething urban grind. You could
live out your professional life in the fourth largest city in the nation and
see no one other than your close friends and co-workers.
Spend four years inside the hedges at Rice and move into a walled-in community
in Clear Lake, drive to work by yourself Monday through Friday and shop at the
closest suburban mall when you need to. Even trips from nightclub to nightclub
or bar to bar require the automobile.
There is no sense of being a part of something else here, no sense of
responsibility for a common area, no sense of being in a city save
for the
overabundance of car dealerships. Houston has the material aspect of the city,
but none of a city's unique feeling of community.
I miss the conversation with the stranger on the train and the surprise
encounter on the streets. I think this has to do with the fact that we don't
have the chance to walk through the streets; we don't have the chance to engage
the attention of that stranger on the train.
The post-war, haphazard suburban boom is culpable in many ways. The suburbs
went up while the inner-city community withered and the tax dollars fled. Along
with the money fled urbiculture's historic and communal heritage. My own
beloved Atlanta is a casualty of the air conditioner and the automobile.
Suburbanites work in the city, use its resources and facilities, come for its
sports, but leave every day at 5 p.m., leaving the city's heart to deal with
its own problems of overuse and underfunding.
The argument is in some sense analogous to Nike's affairs overseas. To
paraphrase noted economist (and Rice alumnus) Hermann Daly, capitalism has been
said to internalize profit and externalize costs. Suburbia has done an
admirable job of that. Vast sums of money pass through downtown but hardly help
the plight of the area.This money and any feelings of responsibility are packed
away to Sugarland every afternoon. The mentality is: If I don't live there, why
should I care?
All in all, this is a plea for some real urban planning. Not just zoning laws,
but real efforts to encourage folks to move back to the city. For example, we
can implement incentives for developers to renovate the downtown area and for
regional and metropolitan-area planning that facilitates communities built
around people, not streets.
Cities can plan highways to promote high-density living instead of sprawl and
perhaps even allow for rail travel sometime in the distant future. People are
interested in more than just housing costs, and I think that there is a desire
for that fading feeling of fellowship and a willingness to pay for less
traffic, businesses and neighbors within walking distance, less stress and
strolls through the park. The newfound interest in building communities as they
were 70 years ago is a step in the right direction, and I can only hope that
the initiative will spread.
If you build it, they will come. As for those of you who will graduate and stay
in the big city, try living in town. You just might find that you like the
feeling you get where the streets radiate humanity.
This item appeared in the Opinion section of the April 11, 1997 issue.
|