|
To the editor:
Hey
Thresher
! Get off your high horse, and give the student body the
newspaper they expect.
I think we've had enough protest, enough preaching, enough of keeping this
issue alive with the
Thresher
alone. Because if you had not noticed,
the rest of the student body is not up in arms about this. I'm not saying that
the First Amendment is not important. On the contrary, I would argue that it
is the most important.
With that said, the latest "statement" from the
Thresher --
the blank
issue -- is a poor one at best. First of all, I question the sincerity of a
supposed "protest issue" that comes with a J. Crew insert in the middle and
still contains all the ads. Were they included because the
Thresher
is
trying to recoup the money they should have had to refund advertisers when last
year's graduation issue came out two months late? And speaking of lateness:
Was this issue run because it was deadline time again, and rather than having
the paper a day late as it was last week, the staff resorted to this quick and
easy solution of writing a staff editorial and being done with it? These are a
few alternative motivations that came to my mind that I feel need to be
voiced.
Furthermore, I find it interesting that an issue dedicated to the preservation
of free speech omits information on how to contribute letters to the editor. I
had to look at the previous week's issue to get the appropriate e-mail address.
I also wonder where all the letters to the editor that were submitted last week
ended up. It shows a distinct lack of respect for opinions that are not that
of the
Thresher
. Even if the
Thresher
were to run last week's
letters this week, there is a factor of timeliness that is being ignored.
This "alert" to the Rice community was poorly done, and more thought should
have gone into it. So far this year one issue has been blank and the other
late.
If this kind of quality continues, then what the
Thresher
prints is not
going to matter, because no one is going to take the time to read it. And no
press at all would be the most tragic blow to freedom of the press Rice could
suffer.
Nate Blair
Wiess '98
This item appeared in the Opinion section of the September 19, 1997 issue.
|