The Register-Guard, Eugene, Oregon, Saturday, January 20, 1990
Wetlands: A barrier to growth?
Issue called 'cloud' on site development
By ANN PORTAL
The Register-Guard
Rohr Industries Inc., struggling with plans to build a manufacturing plant
in west Eugene, could become the test case for dealing with federal
wetlands laws affecting many of the city's best industrial sites.
Officials dealing with the California-based aerospace firm say the
wetlands situation on Rohr's chosen site -- 100 acres just east of Mahion
Sweet Airport -- is well on its way to being resolved.
But even if all goes according to plan for Rohr, property owners say the
company's experiences illustrate how wetlands regulations are stifling
industrial development in west Eugene.
"The wetlands issue has put a cloud on any development," said Russ Svingen
of Eugene, part of a group of local investors that owns a 16-acre
industrial parcel on Danebo Avenue.
Svingen and his partners bought the land about nine years ago after city
officials earmarked west Eugene for future industrial growth and invested
$12 million of public money in sewers and streets.
But even though the Eugene economy is prospering "it's difficult to get
anyone real interested" in the property, Svingen said. "When they hear
'wetlands,' they just walk away."
The city has been grappling with the issue of wctlands preservation vs.
industrial development since the fall of 1988, when Portland biologist
Esther Lev documented about 760 acres of wetlands in west Eugene. That
included 465 acres zoned for industrial use and some of the city's largest
vacant sites.
Lev's estimate was more than tripled in November after release of a new
federal definition that local officials interpret to extend wetlands
protection to so-called "disturbed agricultural lands." Those are areas
that do not currently support wetlands plants but could if farming were
halted.
City and state officials are urging the federal government to change the
new definition. Property owners, meanwhile, are wrestling with the
result.
Wetlands fall under federal protection for their wildlife and plant
habitat and their aid in flood control and water purification. Developers
must obtain fill permits from the state and federal governments and must
agree to create new wetlands elsewhere before they can build on such
sites, a process called mitigation.
Rohr is the first company to try to build a new manufacturing plant in
Eugene since the wetlands were discovered. Ironically, it chose the site
near the airport last summer partly because "we told them there weren't
any wetlands there," said John Lively, executive director of the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Partnership.
That was before the federal government released its new wetlands field
manual last fall, which when applied to the site -- a ryegrass field --
turned up at least 60 acres of wetlands, said Jim Saul, a Eugene land use
consultant representing the property owners.
For Rohr, as for all developers, the main concern about wetlands is not
financial but logistical, Lively said. "The issue (for Rohr) then became
timing - not that you couldn't build on it, but ultimately how long it
would take to do that."
He hopes not too long. Rohr already has orders for the parts of jet engine
shrouds that would be manufactured at the Eugene plant and must begin
construction by spring, company officials said.
Rohr "obviously has run into wetlands in other places," Lively said. "if
we can work with them to get it mitigated, then ultimately, they're
agreeable to that." Company officials have not yet committed to building
in Eugene, awaiting the resolution of the wetlands and several other
issues.
Saul said a wetland mitigation plan for the first phase of development,
involving 10 acres, already has been submitted to state and federal
agencies. It calls for the creation of an equal amount of new wetlands on
adjacent property that is under the same ownership, he said.
Lively said the state will pay for the cost of mitigation, which is not
yet known. "That's been confirmed to the company," he said.
Mitigation costs range from about $5,000 to $10,000 per acre, not
including the price of buying the land, which could easily double the
total, said Steve Gordon, senior program manager for the Lane Council of
Governments.
The difficulty when advising potential developers is that not all wetlands
are created equal, he said. Some, such as marshes and ash forests, are of
much higher value and, as a result, are much more costly to replace than
lower-quality wetlands, such as the disturbed agricultural wetlands on the
Rohr site.
"Almost any kind of wetland you could imagine would have greater functions
and values than an agricultural wetland," Gordon said.
Such differences in quality of wetlands also account for big differences
in the amount of time it takes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
federal Environmental Protection Agency to approve mitigation plans, he
said. "There's always uncertainty," Gordon said.
In routine cases, approval of mitigation plans can be obtained within 90
days. But if a case is controversial or if one of the federal agencies
doesn't like the mitigation plan, "it can take a long, long, long, long
time," he said.
Spectra-Physics Inc., also in west Eugene, has been waiting more than a
year for the Corps of Engineers to approve its plans to mitigate about
five acres of wetlands that would be lost in an anticipated $7.5 million
expansion.
That case also involves creating another 20 acres of wetlands to replace
an area that was filled when the company built its original Eugene plant
in 1979. The company was not told of the presence of wetlands on the
property.
While the spotlight is on Rohr, other owners of property in west Eugene
say they have been equally frustrated by federal wetlands policies for a
couple of years now.
Former Eugene Mayor Ed Cone said he gave his children a 160-acre parcel
just west of Danebo Avenue that is "just sitting and waiting" for a large
industrial plant.
But after spending several thousand dollars studying the extent of
wetlands on the property, using the old definition of wetlands, he has
since had to bring engineers back to take another look using the new
definition.
The consultants determined that about one-quarter of the site meets the
new wetlands definition, he said. There have been potential tenants --
including Rohr -- but no takers, he said.
Small businesses and property owners are coping with wetlands along with
the big firms.
George Wingard, a Eugene real estate investor and former state senator,
said he would like to expand his six-acre development on Stewart Road,
where he builds small warehouses and leases them to people opening small
manufacturing firms.
But when he began to build last year, "the next thing I knew, I got a
letter from the state saying I had to move the fill dirt," he said. "I was
astounded that (the property) was considered a wetland."
Wingard said his wetlands were created when the city improved Stewart Road
about 10 years ago and in the process interrupted the normal drainage off
his property.
"I've talked to the fellow at the state about this. He said, 'We're not
concerned about how it got there. We're concerned that it's a wetland,'"
Wingard said.
Wingard said he hesitates to complain too loudly about wetlands
regulations because he respects their contribution to the environment.
"My first reaction was, 'I don't want to talk about it,'" he said. "I
guess it's so upsetting because I've been involved in environmental
measures all my life."
Gordon said Wingard's concerns are common among developers, especially
companies that are new to Eugene and don't want their introduction to
smack of disregard for the environment. "A lot of firms don't like that.
They're trying to be environmentally sensitive, a lot of them," Gordon
said.
Wetlands
Here are the different types of local wetlands, ranked generally by their
value as wildlif habitat and how difficult they would be to replace. An
exception is the praine grasslands. Experts are uncertain about whether
tufted hairgrass, the dominant plant, successfully can be replaced.
| Type |
Functions |
Typical plant species |
| Pond |
Runoff storage,
waterfowl habitat |
Cattail, rush |
| Stream |
Channel for runoff,
aquatic habitat, provides interconnecting passage for animals |
Cattail, rush, sedges |
| Ash forests |
Bird and wildlife
habitat, runoff retention |
Oregon ash |
| Scrub/shrub swamp |
Bird and waterfowl
habitat, runoff retention |
Oregon ash, willows |
| Marsh |
Bird and waterfowl
habitat, aquatic life, flood control, pollution control |
Cattail, rush,
sedges, reed, canary grass |
| Wet prairie grasslands |
Bird and wildlife
habitat, groundwater cleansing, flood control |
Tufted hairgrass |
Disturbed agricultural
lands |
Bird and wildlife
habitat, groundwater cleansing |
Domestic crops.
If farming ceases, tufted hairgrass. |
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation and Oregon Department of
Tranportation environmental impact statement for the West Eugene Parkway;
Lane Council of Governments
GRAPHIC: FERIL ANDCO/ The Register-Guard
Source: The Register-Guard, Eugene, Oregon, January 20, 1990