The Register-Guard, Eugene, Oregon, May 20, 1991
By Harry Esteve
The Register-Guard
Out of a swamp of federal rules and conflicting emotions over wetlands, a
truce appears to be emerging among environmentalists, business interests
and local governments charged with protecting the grassy, marshy areas of
west Eugene.
"The typical antagonism isn't there," said Pat Decker, a city of Eugene
planner who is working on the west Eugene wetlands issue. "We thing we
have the environmental and development communities supporting our
approach."
The olive branch comes in the form of a plan to protect or restore what
ecologists believe to be the most important wetland plots while allowing
development in areas of lesser environmental value. IF implemented fully,
the cost of the plan would exceed $18 million.
Wetlands--areas that are moist for extended periods during the year--are
considered critical habitat for birds, water fowl, other forms of wildlife
and rare plants. They also have proved effective at filtering out
pollution and controlling floods.
Federal regulations calling for the preservation of the nation's wetlands
have led to a clash between conservation groups, which want the
protections applied broadly, and developers worried that the restrictions
could bring industrial growth to a screeching halt in areas like west
Eugene, where 1,400 acres of wetlands have been identified.
The latest development occurred last week in Washington, D.C. where three
federal agencies proposed yet another change in the wetlands definition
that would allow development on millions of acres that now are protected.
The proposed change, which is under fire by environmental groups, would
loosen the definition imposed two years ago. The new definition would
require surface flooding for more than 14 consecutive days during the
growing season. Wetlands plants also would have to be present.
Steve Gordon, a senior planner with the Lane Council of Governments, said
the proposed change could remove the wetlands label from up to 500 acres
in west Eugene. He said he hasn't received a copy of new definition,
however.
But even if the number of acres of west Eugene wetlands were to decrease,
"I don't think it would change the direction of our plan that much," he
said. "We've not been totally driven in trying to find a solution by the
federal manual."
Two key elements of the west Eugene plan are a proposed local government
buyout of the best wetland areas from private owners and a permit system
that allows local governments to approve construction in lesser quality
wetlands or adjacent to wetlands. Currently, developers face an often
confusing gantlet of state and federal permit agencies when trying to
build on or near wetlands.
The 80-page document, titled "West Eugene Wetlands Special Area Study,"
covers 1,430 acres of identified wetlands in what is widely considered to
be Lane County's prime industrial growth area. The study outlines
protections for about 75 percent of the wetland acreage and identifies
areas where growth can occur.
If construction occurs on a wetland, the property owner must then
"replace" the lost land by paying for the creation or restoration of other
wetland areas.
The plan will be subject of a series of hearing, beginning with a public
hearing Tuesday before Eugene, Springfield and Lane County planning
commissions. The hearing begins at 7 p.m. at Harris Hall, 125 E. Eighth
Ave, Eugene.
Before it goes into effect, the plan must be approved by the Eugene and
Springfield city councils as well as the Lane County Board of
Commissioners.
The plan has the early backing of business representatives and
conservation groups that historically have been at odds with one another
over how much land should be made off-limits to development under new
federal guidelines regarding wetlands protection.
"We're generally very supportive" of the plan, said Art Farley director
of the Lane County Audubon Society. "It reflects a pretty good
compromise."
"We have reviewed it and we're very much in favor of it," said Clayton
Walker, who represents both the Eugene Chamber of Commerce and a west
Eugene neighborhood group overseeing the area wetlands issue.
Farley and Walker say their respective organizations have some quibbles
over some of the technical points of the study, issues they both termed as
minor. But both plan to lobby for its adoption and for federal funds to
help purchase the wetland acreage earmarked for preservation.
Local government officials who worked on the wetlands study say they're
pleased by the meeting of minds within the environmental and conservation
communities, but they're just as excited by other, not so obvious ,
aspects of the wetlands plan.
If the plan is adopted and can be carried out successfully, Eugene could
become a model for other communities that are being forced by federal
clean water laws to revise their land use codes to save wetlands areas,
Gordon said. He and LCOG coordinated the west Eugene study.
The goals of the plan go well beyond simply setting the land aside. The
goals include creation of a network of interconnecting wetlands along the
Amazon Channel, Willow Creek and other west Eugene waterways. Some of the
wetlands would be accessible as public parks and some would be reserved
for rare plant populations, wildlife or flood control.
"You could actually turn the Amazon Channel, which is a sewer right now,
into a much more attractive waterway," Gordon said. A 'greenway corridor"
of wetlands could be established that would connect south Eugene, downtown
and west Eugene, "Turning something once considered a problem into
something we could be proud of."
Additionally, the preserved wetlands could play a key role in solving
what may become the next major environmental problem facing urban
areas--treatment of storm water runoff, said Deborah Evans of Eugene's
public works department.
The federal government has issued regulations requiring communities to
filter storm drainage--water that normally runs from streets into storm
sewer systems and eventually back into lakes and rivers without any
treatment for pollutants.
Studies have shown that storm water is a major contributor to water
pollution. Other studies show that storm water goes through a natural
purification process when it passes through wetlands, Gordon said.
Waterways such as the Amazon Channel carry much of the Eugene's storm
water runoff, which eventually flows into Fern Ridge Reservoir.
Protecting and restoring wetlands along the channel offers an ideal
solution, he said.
"The term that's in vogue is 'soft technology,'" Gordon said. "How can
you use natural conditions to solve your problems, something other than
concrete?"
Perhaps most importantly, wetlands are natural havens within cities that
people as well as wildlife enjoy, Gordon said.
"People are naturally attracted to water," he said. "Hunters hunt for
ducks in wetlands. Kids like to splash around in wetlands. Some people
like to sit and contemplate in wetlands."
Source: The Register-Guard, Eugene, Oregon, May 20, 1991